the benefits of reading SF
Jun. 11th, 2009 08:10 amI played in my first Scrabble tournament last weekend. My objectives, going in, were to use the clock effectively (it's like a chess clock, you press it to end your turn and start your opponent's clock ticking), not to break any rules, and not to care if I won or lost.
I lost my first three games (before lunch) by from 6 to 136 points. So maybe they scheduled me for the dregs of the players in the afternoon, not sure, but I won three out of four afternoon games.
Scrabble players, at least the tournament kind, memorize lists. Now I don't do that. Well, I've memorized the list of two letter words, but I can define all of them. I don't study anagrams of various 7 letter combinations (although perhaps I should) but I do have a far reaching vocabulary and sometimes it gets me in trouble.
In this tournament I played "laager", "scry", and "scop". The last two were challenged, and were - of course - good. The first was only NOT challenged because I was playing against someone from my local club who happens to know that I know weird words and that they are real. This doesn't always work to my advantage, though. I gleefully placed a "D" in front of "ELOPE" to run a word on a triple word score once only to find that DELOPE is only eligible in British scrabble, not in the US. So much for all those dueling scenes in Georgette Heyer.
But SF is indeed good for a lot. I tend to keep a sticky note in what I'm reading these days and put down unusual words to then look them up in the Scrabble dictionary to see if they acceptable. I got, and played, WEIGELA, GOBSHITE, and GURRIES from Anne McCaffrey. From S M Stirling I've pulled LAAGER, CHAMFRON, PEYTRAL, and REMUDA. And who's the best? Why Julian May, naturally. That woman has a vocabulary of weird words that would make even
jonsinger and
lisajulie blink.
I lost my first three games (before lunch) by from 6 to 136 points. So maybe they scheduled me for the dregs of the players in the afternoon, not sure, but I won three out of four afternoon games.
Scrabble players, at least the tournament kind, memorize lists. Now I don't do that. Well, I've memorized the list of two letter words, but I can define all of them. I don't study anagrams of various 7 letter combinations (although perhaps I should) but I do have a far reaching vocabulary and sometimes it gets me in trouble.
In this tournament I played "laager", "scry", and "scop". The last two were challenged, and were - of course - good. The first was only NOT challenged because I was playing against someone from my local club who happens to know that I know weird words and that they are real. This doesn't always work to my advantage, though. I gleefully placed a "D" in front of "ELOPE" to run a word on a triple word score once only to find that DELOPE is only eligible in British scrabble, not in the US. So much for all those dueling scenes in Georgette Heyer.
But SF is indeed good for a lot. I tend to keep a sticky note in what I'm reading these days and put down unusual words to then look them up in the Scrabble dictionary to see if they acceptable. I got, and played, WEIGELA, GOBSHITE, and GURRIES from Anne McCaffrey. From S M Stirling I've pulled LAAGER, CHAMFRON, PEYTRAL, and REMUDA. And who's the best? Why Julian May, naturally. That woman has a vocabulary of weird words that would make even
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)